Tim Burton’s Sleepy Hollow and Washington Irving’s short story
The Legend of Sleepy Hollow are two very different stories shared by the same
title. There is nothing wrong with this, Burton, just like Irving, has creative
license to make the movie in the way he wanted. Both the story and the movie
are creative and interesting in their own way. In my personal opinion, I
believe that Burton is using the title and the characters to enhance this
horror story and turn it into something creepier that Irving’s. One of the few
similarities is the Headless Horseman- in both cases he is a German Hessian.
Irving’s story has a dread that hangs throughout the tale, but it is nowhere as
creepy as Burton’s movie. Burton’s depiction is much more eerie and horrific,
especially through his use of dark colors and contrasts with pale coloring. In
my opinion, he took Irving’s eerie-ness and turned it up a notch to fit his
artistic style. The depiction of Irving’s characters is very different in the
movie that in the story. In the short story, Ichabod Crane is a schoolteacher
and in the movie he is a detective from New York. What Burton did take away
from the original Ichabod was how Ichabod was easily scared and spooked. Both
the story and the movie he jumps at anything and gets scared easily. I think
Burton did this because it is comedic that a detective would be scared and
spooked so easily. One would think that someone assigned to a murder
investigation would not be so easily scared of blood. In both the short story
and the movie there is the element of magic and supernatural practices. However
they are both used differently in both accounts. In Irving’s story, Ichabod is
a master of witchcraft. This is totally different from the movie where Ichabod
does not believe in magic or the supernatural. The rest of the community of
Sleepy Hollow had told Ichabod several times upon his arrival that the murderer
was the Headless Horseman but he never believed it until he finally saw him for
himself. Burton takes the character of Ichabod Crane and witchcraft from
Irving’s story and dramatically changes them in his interpretation because he
believed he could make a creepier and scarier depiction of the story of Sleepy
Hollow. Katrina van Tassel is another main character from Irving’s story that
Burton takes away and “tweaks” in his own way. In the original story Brom did
not bewitch her, nor was she attracted to Ichabod. I believe Burton made
Katrina have an attraction to Ichabod because he knows that an audience loves a
little romance or something of a love story between two people. He used this
romance to keep his audience interested in his movie. I do not think it is a
bad thing that Burton strayed away so far from the original story; rather it
gives more attention to both the story and the movie. Audiences are fascinated by
both accounts of the legend of Sleepy Hollow because of how differently each is
portrayed.
Olivia Turnage
ReplyDeleteWhen you say that they are two different stories, I don’t believe that is safe to say. Yes, if your just surfacing the two work but when you look at their profound meaning they are easily to compare to having similarities. I don’t believe the title was just used to enhance his story either, as to he actually used a hollow tree in the movie, as seen at the end of the movie it played a large role. It brought the movie together as it is where the headless horseman and the witch like women who held his head to control him occupied when things were all said and done. So why did you think it was just to enhance the movie? Also the plot of the story basically came from the Irving story. The story of the whole headless horse man came from the Irving story. Tim Burton did not come up with this plot by himself own. Although you would think something of this nature would come from him this did not. I believe Tim Burton adopted the characters and plot and added little twist on them to make it his own, turning it into the film sleepy hollow
Turnage,Olivia
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI think that these two works are not two completely different stories, but instead one is an adaptation of the other. I think Burton uses many ideas and elements of Irving's story, but adds more depth to them. I really like your point about how Burton takes elements from Washington Irving's story, but twists them to make them creepier and more Burton-esque. However, I disagree with your point about how the reason that Burton added the love interest between Ichabod and Katrina was because he knew that the audience would like a love-story. I think that it is true that Burton realized that this love-story would keep the audience captivated, but I think that he mainly included this in order to add more depth to both of these characters, as wells as adding a more intricate plot line to the main story.
ReplyDelete-Melissa Johnston