Another difference between Irving’s at Burton’s works is the ending. In the story, Ichabod Crane flees the town when Brom throws a Jack-O-Lantern at Crane while he is dressed as the headless horseman. In the movie however, Ichabod does not flee because he hears Brom and his friends off in the distance laughing about what just happened.
Burton also creates more depth in the character of Ichabod Crane by giving insight to why he is the way he is. Burton includes scenes that show some of Ichabod’s dreams, and even tells us that Crane’s mother was murdered by his father because his father believed that Crane’s mother participated in witchcraft.
Another difference is the relationship between Ichabod Crane and Katrina Van Tassel. In Washington Irving’s story, Ichabod falls in love with Katrina, but the same feelings are not reciprocated. In Burton’s film Katrina falls in love with Ichabod, even going so far as to try to cast a spell on him in order to protect him from evil things.
In comparing both the story, The Legend of Sleepy Hollow and the film Sleepy Hollow, I think Burton uses Washington Irving’s idea, but elaborates on the story, and creates the story of what would have happened if Ichabod did not flee after Brom’s cruel joke. I think Burton added more depth into Irving’s characters, and created the original story to produce a story of his own.
Melissa, great blog entry! You did a great job comparing Tim Burton's version of Ichabod Crane to Washington Irving's version. I thoroughly enjoyed it! I completely agree with you that Tim Burton didn't just changed the story, he enhanced it and made it more original. He turned it into something that could make a movie as opposed to the short story which was great, but not long enough. It was an expansion, almost like a "what if Ichabod Crane hadn't left Sleepy Hollow", as you had stated. The variants of the story do not make it a completely new one, just a more indepth adaptation!
ReplyDeleteDevin Bogle