Washington Irving’s short story Sleepy Hallow is about a lanky man named
Ichabod Crane who is a schoolteacher in the shady town of Sleepy Hallow, that
falls in love with a woman, which leads to him being run out of town. Not very
long, about 10 pages, despite this, Tim Burton was still able to create a movie
that is (loosely) based on this story by Washington Irving that is almost 2
hours long. Burton kept the name of the town and the characters the same as in
the story, but that’s about it. Ichabod Crane, who is described in the story as
being lanky and very crane like, is played by the universally attractive Johnny
Depp, who is anything but lanky. In the movie, Ichabod is also not a school
teacher, but a police detective. The only qualities of Ichabod Crane from the
story that Burton chose to incorporate in his film were that he is very
superstitious, and that he is educated. Burton chose to feature these traits
because they are what make Ichabod Crane an outcast; these qualities make him
different from everyone else in Sleepy Hallow, as well as New York, which is
where he is from in the movie. I don’t consider Irving’s story to be a horror
story, though some might, but Burton took the supernatural qualities of the
story and just ran with them. A very important difference between the movie and
the story is that in the story, the headless horseman is a myth that is told
all around the town, and in the end, the readers find out that it is just a
story and there isn’t a real horseman; in the movie, the horseman is a real
spirit that is summoned from the dead to kill. Burton doesn’t “enhance” a
horror story because Irving’s story was not a horror story to begin with. Rather,
Burton creates a horror story from, what I find to be, a very overrated short
story. He makes the storyline much more interesting as well as the characters;
Irving’s story leaves a lot to the imagination and builds up to a finale that I
find to be very lame.
you gave a pretty short response. however you hit key points on the differences between the movie and the short story. I agree the story was not interesting at all. It was full of over explanations of what the characters looked like. I felt the story had no depth and explained very little on the headless horseman of sleepy hollow himself.
ReplyDelete-Jackie